Where Will It All End?


Recently I have been thinking about outcomes. You know, behavioral outcomes and the reinforcement that naturally follows, and future behavior by other actor(s) that is influenced by the fate of earlier actors.

When we see someone get spanked (literally or figuratively), we oftentimes realize that we had better shape up, or we might get beat next, and of course the effect is (usually, mind you) even stronger when it is you that is getting beat down. Conversely, an environment of permissiveness is created when bad actions (whether implicitly or explicitly bad) are not punished or are encouraged, and this will naturally lead to an environment of permissiveness and wantonness, and to increasingly extreme behavior.

We saw this in Abu Ghraib, but from a legal standpoint we have little knowledge or even vocabulary to describe precisely where the point of culpability stands when ‘creating an environment of’ whatever is accomplished. This process is understood only as a slouch into insanity; there is no model of the pillars of civility and rationality that must be broken down to achieve such a horrible result.

Fortunately, according to the records we already have, I am quite sure a full and fair investigation will lead to criminal charges against top political figures utilizing existing law for creating such an environment with the knowledge if not actual intent that crimes would be committed there.

But this post is not about Cheney and the torturers at all. It about the cheerleaders of war, the Sullivans and Hitchens and McArdles and Friedmans, and all the others, down to the littlest ones over at Renew America or World Net Daily.

These are people who actively pleasured themselves with the prospects of violence and cruelty of war, with all of the attendant rape, pillage and murder fully realized (more than fully realized, probably) within their tiny skulls. These are people who were able to wrap anything in the entire world up within their need for power, even if it was just (in the case of some of the less well-compensated cheerleaders) power at a distance.

Now, I could go on and on as above, but that doesn’t seem to be particularly useful. Rather, I would like to focus on something that I think everyone left of center (which is a big portion of the US populace now) realizes: We have got a pox of these idiot war cheerleaders at present. There are just too many, I don’t know what adjective to use for the entire class, dumb or horribly mistaken or totally corrupt or worthless or slight psychotic, or whatever, but there are way way too many of them. Wrong. That’s it, people who are just wrong. And we should stop listening to people who have proven themselves to be just wrong. I don’t think that statement will shake the world.

I would suggest that if we are still reading the musings of Friedman and Sullivan and McArdle ten years from now, then I would expect almost nothing about our political culture to change within that time. We are framed by these people, we let their idiocies become the talking points of the day, and in many ways we let them choose the terms of debate. Even to have us all wasting time talking about the scratching of a butt.

That last part probably is more our fault than theirs, but their continued good-standing in our political discourse is effective death for any kind of real change. That must be realized. The reign of these people, as a class, must end before we will have any change in the political thinking of our nation.

Outcomes matter. People watch, and like the monkeys we all are, we (mostly) watch and learn. The next generation will find new smear merchants when the time comes, and they will operate without fear unless we change the nature of the game. Now.


************************


If you look at this group as a whole, you notice that many have been shuffled off to right-wing land once they prove a little too extreme for the rest of us. Malkin is an example of that, I don’t believe she is invited on any other networks other than Fox, where she knows how to do her job. On other channels she has proven unable to meet even the low standards for talking heads.

Hitchens, of course, has become a caricature of himself, and is no longer relevant.

But why do we still suffer others, such as McArdle and Sullivan? Why do we continue to let their idiotic theories and revisionist stories rebound around the innertubes? Why do we suffer these people anymore?

Kevin Drum links to Sullivan regularly, and even holds his tongue (barely) while reporting on a sick, pitiful revision of history, now that the Betsy McCaughey party seems over. Josh Marshall deems Sullivan’s site as TPM-approved. The Washington Independent, of all sites, links on its front page to Andrew Sullivan.

I am not going to go through the many failings of Andy Sullivan, as I assume those to be known. Attention-whoring, traitor-calling, and yet somehow still not toxic. Yet.


************************


I have been thinking about these hypocrits a lot recently, especially those who publicly support one set of morals while reveling in another, quite different set.

Take, oh, Andy Sullivan for example. Now, we all know he is a long time appeaser of the GOP and basically carries water for the Party. I am not going to go through the various evidence of that, this is no secret.

But it is instructive to look at how Andy’s personal life meshes, or fails to mesh, with his supposed political values and morals. Here is a gay man who publicly supports a party that hates him for his sexuality. A party that supports anti-gay bigotry, thinks of AIDS as god’s vengeance on homosexuals, and would not lift a finger to stop gay bashing. But it is ok, Sully doesn’t want to get married. So no pressure, you see. He is busy bringing about change from within the party. Heh.

But now that is not enough. Now Sully is proven to be a pot smoker. After years of blindly supporting a party which wished to, at all times, increase the penalties for pot possession. How many degrees of hypocrisy does the man actually have? I think this bastard has got multi-dimensional hypocrisies by now.

Isn’t that lovely? Sully gets to use the money he made shilling for the corporate GOP to hire a nice fancy lawyer to get him out of the drug charges he certainly never expected (someone of my stature, you understand) to face. Whew! Ok, all is well now, wow that was a rush, now wasn’t it!!


************************


The White House is right to go after Fox News and attempt to marginalize them. Sure, they can ‘report’ anything they want. But they cannot continue to command any measure of respect once they decide they can just make up their own facts.

The above link is a reader comment that David Kurtz posted. It seems somehow appropriate to this discussion:


The GOP depends upon their ability to make stuff up and inject it into the political consciousness. Their whole modus operandi is rooted in their ability to distort reality. And they’re able to do that because of talk radio and a couple of other media outlets…



Does the above not summarize Andrew Sullivan’s entire blogging career? There needs to be a reckoning in the blogosphere as well. Andrew Sullivan is a petty, lying, scummy little man. He should be relegated to the hard right sites like Michelle Malkin and programs where he can be ridiculed and rejected by his own ideological bed-mates.

We simply can’t afford his kind of mendacity any longer. Our political discourse is sick enough as it is. Purging our system is very much in order.


This entry was posted in International Justice, us.politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Where Will It All End?

  1. Pingback: Slowly build up; and break it down | 工商法

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>